Published:
Last updated:
Can a Collection Agency Garnish Your Wages in Canada?
Legal limits and cost ranges below were verified on 11 August 2026. Rates move — everything here is a range, not a quote.
Someone has told you your pay is about to be taken. Before anything else: that is not something a collection agency can simply arrange.
There is a legal sequence, every step of it takes time, and you get notice at more than one point along the way. Knowing where you sit in that sequence tells you exactly how much time you have and what to do with it.
No — not on its own. For an ordinary consumer debt, a creditor or its agency must sue you, win, and obtain a judgment before any part of your pay can be touched. Only then can it get a garnishment order and serve your employer. That takes months at minimum, and every stage gives you a chance to end it.
Two different readers land on this page. If you rent or have no property, the parts you need are the legal sequence, the provincial limits, whether the debt is even still suable, and the trustee route — all below. If you own a home, there is an additional option: paying the judgment out of your equity lifts the order entirely, and that is covered further down.
- The sequence is fixed: demand → lawsuit → judgment → garnishment order → employer served. Nothing skips a step.
- A demand letter or a phone call is not a garnishment and gives nobody any power over your pay.
- Ontario caps ordinary garnishment at 20% of net wages — and only tax, CPP and EI come off before that calculation.
- Alberta exempts the first $800 a month, plus $200 per dependant, takes 50% between $800 and $2,400, and 100% above $2,400.
- CRA and support enforcement do not follow those limits, and neither needs to sue you first. Different problem, different answer.
- Two other gaps worth knowing: self-employed and contractor income generally gets no wage exemption at all, and a wage assignment you signed at the time of the loan is not a garnishment and may not need a court order.
- A judgment can be paid out and the garnishment lifted — before it starts or after.
- CreditReboot will tell you within a day whether your equity covers the judgment — and if it does not, who to speak to instead.
The sequence, and roughly how long each step takes
Timelines vary by court and by how hard the file is fought, but the shape is consistent. Read down until you find where you actually are.
| Stage | What it is | Can your pay be touched? |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Demand | Letters and calls. In Ontario a written notice must come first and six days must pass before contact for payment | No |
| 2. Lawsuit filed | A claim is issued and served on you. You have a set period to respond | No |
| 3. Judgment | The court confirms the debt — often by default, because nobody responded | Not yet, but enforcement is now available |
| 4. Garnishment order | A separate step, taken out against the judgment | Not until it is served |
| 5. Employer served | Payroll must withhold and remit until the judgment is satisfied | Yes — within the provincial limits below |
The single most damaging thing you can do is ignore a claim at stage two. Most consumer judgments are default judgments — granted because the person served never filed a response. Respond, and you keep the process slow and negotiable. Ignore it, and you hand over the timetable.
First check: can they still sue you at all?
Before you worry about payroll, find out whether stage two is even available to them. If it is not, the rest of the sequence never starts.
Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan each give a creditor two years to start a claim, generally running from the point the claim was discovered — in practice, your last payment or your last written acknowledgment of the debt. Miss that window and the debt becomes what people call statute-barred.
Three things about that are widely misunderstood, and getting them wrong is expensive:
- It is a defence you have to raise. A court will not throw the claim out on its own. If you ignore a statement of claim on a time-barred debt, you can still end up with a default judgment against you — and then a garnishment — on a debt nobody could have successfully sued you for. This is the single most costly misunderstanding on this page.
- A payment or a written acknowledgment can restart the clock. Where the two years have not already run out, a partial payment or an admission in writing can reset it. That does not mean you should never pay anything — on a recent debt, a sensible arrangement is usually the right move. It means find out where you sit on the clock before you make a goodwill payment on an old one.
- Statute-barred is not gone. The debt still exists. A collection agency may still contact you about it and it can still appear on your credit report, which runs on its own separate six-year timetable from the first missed payment. What changes is the ability to enforce it through the courts.
If you think a debt might be past the deadline, get the dates checked before you respond to anything — and if a claim has already been served, do not simply ignore it.
Provincial wage garnishment limits: Ontario vs Alberta vs Saskatchewan
This is where people are most often frightened by a number that is simply wrong. On ordinary consumer debt, nobody takes your whole pay. The three provinces below are the ones we are licensed in, and they take three genuinely different approaches.
| Ontario | Alberta | Saskatchewan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ordinary debt | Up to 20% of net wages | Exemption first, then a sliding scale | Up to 30% of net, subject to a minimum protected amount |
| Protected amount | 80% of net always stays with you | First $800 a month net exempt, plus $200 per dependant | The greater of 70% of net, or $1,500 plus $300 per dependant |
| Above that | Flat 20% — it does not scale up | 50% of net in the band above the exemption; 100% above the top of the band | Flat 30% once the flat-dollar floor is exceeded |
| What “net” means | Statutory deductions only — tax, CPP, EI. Not union dues, benefits or savings plans | Net pay, assessed monthly against the exemption bands | Net employment remuneration; pro-rated if you are not paid monthly |
| Support obligations | Up to 50% | Separate rules — the bands above do not apply | Separate rules — the exemption above does not apply |
| On $4,850 net, one dependant | ~$970 a month | ~$2,300–$3,200 a month | ~$1,455 a month |
Alberta’s calculation is genuinely contested. Practitioners in Alberta do not all apply the bands the same way — there is disagreement about whether the dependant allowance shifts the 50% band upward, and about whether the exemption itself is capped. A court can also vary the exemption on application where the deduction causes hardship. Treat the Alberta figures here as the shape of the calculation, not a precise entitlement, and get the number checked against your own pay stub.
Exceptions that catch people out.
- The CRA and support enforcement sit outside these limits entirely and do not need to sue you first. If tax debt is what you are facing, that is a different problem with a different answer — see our guide to stopping CRA tax arrears and garnishment.
- Self-employment, contractor and business income generally gets no wage exemption. If you invoice rather than draw a payroll cheque, the protections above may not help you at all.
- A wage assignment is not a garnishment. If you signed one when you took the loan, you gave permission in advance — a court order may not be needed. Check your original agreement before you assume a judgment is required.
Wage garnishment and a frozen bank account are not the same thing
People use “garnishment” for both, and the difference matters enormously.
A wage garnishment is served on your employer. It takes a capped slice of each pay, it is ongoing, and every province limits how much can be taken — that is what the table above is about.
A notice of garnishment served on your bank is a different instrument. It reaches the money sitting in the account, and the percentage protections above do not apply to it in the same way. Government benefits such as CPP, EI or social assistance are generally protected from ordinary creditors, but once those funds are deposited and mixed with other money, proving which dollars are exempt becomes your problem rather than the creditor’s.
The practical consequence: someone who assumes “they can only take 20%” can find an account emptied. If a judgment exists against you, do not leave a large balance sitting in an account at the same institution you owe money to, and get advice before you move funds.
Note also what Ontario’s definition of “net” does to you. Only tax, CPP and EI come off before the 20% is calculated. Union dues, benefit premiums and pension contributions do not. So the amount withheld is a larger share of what actually reaches your bank account than 20% suggests.
What that looks like on a real salary
Illustrative only
Gross salary $78,000. After tax, CPP and EI, net is about $4,850 a month. Union dues and benefits take another $290, so about $4,560 actually lands.
A judgment of $21,400 from an old line of credit.
In Ontario. 20% of $4,850 is $970 a month withheld. That is 21.3% of the $4,560 that used to reach the account. At that rate the judgment takes roughly 22 months to clear before interest and costs.
In Alberta, same pay, one dependant. The first $1,000 is exempt, half of the band above that is protected, and the top of the pay is fully exposed. Depending on how the bands are applied that lands somewhere around $2,300 to $3,200 a month. The precise figure is arguable; the conclusion is not. Alberta’s scale bites far harder than Ontario’s flat 20% at this income.
In Saskatchewan, same pay, one dependant. 70% of $4,850 is $3,395 protected, which beats the $1,800 flat floor, so about $1,455 a month is exposed.
Note the flip side of a harder bite. The same $21,400 judgment takes roughly 22 months to clear in Ontario, about 15 months in Saskatchewan, and only 7 to 9 months in Alberta — before post-judgment interest and costs. Alberta hurts more per month and ends sooner. Which of those matters more depends entirely on whether your household can absorb the monthly hit at all.
The alternative, if you own a home. Say the property is worth $610,000 with a $295,000 mortgage. A second mortgage of $26,000 pays the $21,400 judgment in full and covers a 2% lender fee, a 2% broker fee, about $2,000 legal and a $450 appraisal. Secured debt becomes $321,000 — approximately 53% loan-to-value. At 10.5% interest-only that is $228 a month.
Why $228 is not “cheaper” than $970
Read those two numbers carefully, because the obvious comparison is the wrong one.
The $970 leaving your payroll is repaying the judgment. In about 22 months it is gone, plus post-judgment interest and costs. The $228 second-mortgage payment is interest-only — after those same 22 months you have paid roughly $5,000 in interest and you still owe the full $26,000.
To actually clear the $26,000 over the same 22 months you would need to pay around $1,304 a month. So on total cost, the garnishment is the cheaper of the two — if you can afford to lose $970 a month for two years.
That is the real question, and for a lot of households the answer is no. What the equity route buys is not a lower total cost. It is:
- Cash flow now — $228 instead of $970, at a moment when the household budget has no slack.
- Your employer out of it — payroll stops withholding, and stops knowing.
- Control — you decide the repayment pace instead of a court order deciding it for you.
- The judgment off your file — satisfied rather than sitting registered against the property, which matters at your next renewal.
And the trade you are making: an unsecured judgment becomes debt secured against your house. A credit card is not registered against your home; a second mortgage is. That is a good trade when the payment is comfortably affordable and there is a plan to repay or refinance the balance — a renewal, a lump sum, a dated income event. It is a bad trade when it is being used to buy a few quiet months.
Run the same comparison on your own figures with the credit card vs home equity loan calculator. If the numbers look anything like the box above, send them to us and you will know within a day whether the equity route closes this.
How to stop a wage garnishment, before or after it starts
A garnishment is not permanent. It is an enforcement tool attached to a judgment, and it ends when the judgment is satisfied. That gives homeowners a route that renters simply do not have.
Borrowing against the equity you already hold pays the judgment in full, in one movement. The order is lifted, payroll stops withholding, and what replaces it is a secured payment you arrange on your terms. It costs interest — typically 8% to 15% at the second mortgage tier, with a 1% to 3% lender fee, a 1% to 3% broker fee and $1,500 to $3,000 in legal. That is not cheap money. It is considerably cheaper than a fifth of your pay disappearing every month for two years.
Alternative and private lenders tend to place more weight on the property, the available equity and whether the plan makes sense than a bank would — while still looking at income, credit history, location and how the loan gets repaid. A judgment on title does not end the conversation; it is one of the things this tier exists to clear. Timelines vary with the appraisal, lender conditions and the legal work, and where garnishment has already begun that speed matters — some equity-lender files can close within days once those pieces are in place, while a credit union or B-lender file more typically runs a few weeks. See debt consolidation for homeowners or home equity loans.
Where this is not the answer, we will say so. Most home-equity lending is limited to roughly 80% of the property’s appraised value, though lender and product rules vary — so if you rent, if your equity is thin, or if the judgment plus your mortgage pushes past what the property realistically supports, there is nothing to arrange. In that case speak to a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. Filing a consumer proposal triggers a stay of proceedings that stops wage garnishment, and that is exactly what it is for.
Where we work. The three provinces above are the ones we are licensed in. See the areas we serve, or the local pages for Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Stop the money leaving your pay
Send your address, your mortgage balance and the amount of the judgment or the debt behind it. We will tell you whether your equity clears it, what the monthly cost would be, and how quickly it can fund. If it does not work, we will say so and point you to a trustee.
Confidential equity and garnishment review. A conversation, not an application — we will tell you what the numbers look like before anything is submitted anywhere.
Wage garnishment FAQ
How long before a creditor can garnish wages in Canada?
There is no fixed clock, because the delay is procedural rather than calendar-based. The creditor has to sue, obtain judgment and then take out a garnishment order. In practice that is several months at the very least, and considerably longer if you respond to the claim.
Can a collection agency garnish my wages without going to court?
Not for an ordinary consumer debt. A judgment comes first, and a garnishment order after that. The exceptions are the Canada Revenue Agency and support obligations, which operate under separate and stronger powers.
Will my employer find out?
Yes — payroll has to be served with the order and is legally required to withhold. That is one of the reasons people move quickly to satisfy a judgment: paying it out ends your employer’s involvement.
How much of my pay can be taken in Ontario?
Up to 20% of net wages for ordinary debt, and up to 50% for support. “Net” means only tax, CPP and EI have been deducted — union dues, benefits and pension contributions are not taken off first, so the bite feels larger than 20%.
How much of my pay can be taken in Alberta?
The first $800 of monthly net is exempt, plus $200 for each dependant. Half of the amount in the band above that is protected, and earnings above the top of the band are fully exposed. On a middle income that is a much larger deduction than Ontario’s flat 20%. Be aware that Alberta practitioners do not all apply the bands identically, and a court can vary the exemption where the deduction causes hardship — so get your own figure checked rather than relying on a general table.
Can a debt be too old for a collection agency to sue me?
In Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan a creditor generally has two years to start a claim, running from the last payment or last written acknowledgment of the debt. But this is a defence you have to raise — a court will not apply it for you, so ignoring a claim on an old debt can still produce a default judgment and then a garnishment. Get the dates checked rather than assuming.
Can they freeze my bank account as well as my wages?
Yes, and it works differently. A notice of garnishment served on your bank reaches the funds in the account, and the percentage caps that apply to payroll do not protect an account balance in the same way. Benefits such as CPP or EI are generally protected from ordinary creditors, but once they are mixed with other money in an account, proving which dollars are exempt falls to you.
Can a garnishment be stopped once it has started?
Yes. Satisfy the judgment and the order comes off. Homeowners often do this with a second mortgage or a refinance, which converts a fixed payroll deduction into a payment they control. Renters generally negotiate with the creditor or speak to a trustee.
Can they take my house instead?
A judgment can be registered against the property, which matters when you next refinance or sell. Forcing a sale is a further, much heavier step and is uncommon on ordinary consumer debt — but the registration alone is a good reason to deal with it rather than wait.
CreditReboot is a licensed mortgage brokerage, not a Licensed Insolvency Trustee. Only an LIT can file a consumer proposal or bankruptcy. This article is general information, not insolvency advice.
This article is general information, not legal advice. Garnishment limits and procedure differ by province and by the type of debt. Rate and fee ranges were verified on 11 August 2026 and change frequently; the worked example is illustrative, not an offer.
